[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 40, Volume 1]
[Revised as of July 1, 2007]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
[CITE: 40CFR6.504]
[Page 114-115]
TITLE 40--PROTECTION OF ENVIRONMENT
CHAPTER I--ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
PART 6_PROCEDURES FOR IMPLEMENTING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COUNCIL ON
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ON THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT--
Subpart E_Environmental Review Procedures for Wastewater Treatment
Construction Grants Program
Sec. 6.504 Consultation during the facilities planning process.
(a) General. Consistent with 40 CFR 1501.2 and 35.2030(c), the
responsible official shall initiate the environmental review process
early to identify environmental effects, avoid delays, and resolve
conflicts. The environmental review process should be integrated
throughout the facilities planning process. Two processes for
consultation are described in this section to meet this objective. The
first addresses projects awarded Step 1 grant assistance on or before
December 29, 1981. The second applies to projects not receiving grant
assistance for facilities planning on or before December 29, 1981 and,
therefore, subject to the regulations implementing the Municipal
Wastewater Treatment Construction Grant Amendments of 1981 (40 CFR part
35, subpart I).
(b) Projects receiving Step 1 grant assistance on or before December
29, 1981. (1) During facilities planning, the grantee shall evaluate
project alternatives and the existence of environmentally important
resource areas including those identified in Sec. 6.108 and Sec. 6.509
of this subpart, and potential for open space and recreation
opportunities in the facilities planning area. This evaluation is
intended to be brief and concise and should draw on existing information
from EPA, State agencies, regional planning agencies, areawide water
quality management agencies, and the Step 1 grantee. The Step 1 grantee
should submit this information to EPA or a delegated State at the
earliest possible time during facilities planning to allow EPA to
determine if the action is eligible for a categorical exclusion. The
evaluation and any additional analysis deemed necessary by the
responsible official may be used by EPA to determine whether
[[Page 115]]
the action is eligible for a categorical exclusion from the substantive
environmental review requirements of this part. If a categorical
exclusion is granted, the grantee will not be required to prepare a
formal EID nor will the responsible official be required to prepare an
environmental assessment under NEPA. If an action is not granted a
categorical exclusion, this evaluation may be used to determine the
scope of the EID required of the grantee. This information can also be
used to make an early determination of the need for partitioning the
environmental review or for an EIS. Whenever possible, the Step 1
grantee should discuss this initial evaluation with both the delegated
State and EPA.
(2) A review of environmental information developed by the grantee
should be conducted by the responsible official whenever meetings are
held to assess the progress of facilities plan development. These
meetings should be held after completion of the majority of the EID
document and before a preferred alternative is selected. Since any
required EIS must be completed before the approval of a facilities plan,
a decision whether to prepare an EIS is encouraged early during the
facilities planning process. These meetings may assist in this early
determination. EPA should inform interested parties of the following:
(i) The preliminary nature of the Agency's position on preparing an
EIS;
(ii) The relationship between the facilities planning and
environmental review processes;
(iii) The desirability of public input; and
(iv) A contact person for further information.
(c) Projects not receiving grant assistance for Step 1 facilities
planning on or before December 29, 1981. Potential Step 3 or Step 2+3
grant applicants should, in accordance with Sec. 35.2030(c), consult
with EPA and the State early in the facilities planning process to
determine the appropriateness of a categorical exclusion, the scope of
an EID, or the appropriateness of the early preparation of an
environmental assessment or an EIS. The consultation would be most
useful during the evaluation of project alternatives prior to the
selection of a preferred alternative to assist in resolving any
identified environmental problems.