Previous  Home  Next



[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 40, Volume 1]
[Revised as of July 1, 2007]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
[CITE: 40CFR16.11]

[Page 219-223]
 
                   TITLE 40--PROTECTION OF ENVIRONMENT
 
               CHAPTER I--ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 
PART 16_IMPLEMENTATION OF PRIVACY ACT OF 1974--Table of Contents
 
Sec. 16.11  General exemptions.

    (a) Systems of records affected. EPA-17 OCEFT Criminal Investigative 
Index and Files.
    EPA-40 Inspector General's Operation and Reporting (IGOR) System 
Investigative Files.
    EPA-46 OCEFT/NEIC Master Tracking System.
    (b) Authority. Under 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), the head of any Federal 
agency may by rule exempt any PA system of records within the agency 
from certain provisions of the Act, if the system of records is 
maintained by an agency or component thereof which performs as its 
principal function any activity pertaining to the enforcement of 
criminal laws and which consists of:
    (1) Information compiled for the purpose of identifying individual 
criminal offenders and alleged offenders and consisting only of 
identifying data and notations of arrests, the nature and disposition of 
criminal charges, sentencing, confinement, release, and parole and 
probation status;
    (2) Information compiled for the purpose of a criminal 
investigation, including reports of informants and investigators, and 
associated with an identifiable individual; or

[[Page 220]]

    (3) Reports identifiable to an individual compiled at any stage of 
the process of enforcement of the criminal laws from arrest or 
indictment through release from supervision.
    (c) Qualification for exemption. (1) The Agency's system of records, 
EPA-17 system of records is maintained by the Criminal Investigation 
Division, Office of Criminal Enforcement, Forensics, and Training, a 
component of EPA which performs as its principal function activities 
pertaining to the enforcement of criminal laws. Authority for the 
Division's criminal law enforcement activities comes from Powers of 
Environmental Protection Agency, 18 U.S.C. 3063; Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. 9603; 
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. 6928; Federal Water 
Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. 1319, 1321; Toxic Substances Control 
Act, 15 U.S.C. 2614, 2615; Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7413; Federal 
Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, 7 U.S.C. 136j, 136l; Safe 
Drinking Water Act, 42 U.S.C. 300h-2, 300i-1; Noise Control Act of 1972, 
42 U.S.C. 4912; Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act of 
1986, 42 U.S.C. 11045; and the Marine Protection, Research, and 
Sanctuaries Act of 1972, 33 U.S.C. 1415.
    (2) The Agency's system of records, EPA-40 system of records is 
maintained by the Office of Investigations of the Office of Inspector 
General (OIG), a component of EPA that performs as its principal 
function activities pertaining to the enforcement of criminal laws. 
Authority for the criminal law enforcement activities of the OIG's 
Office of Investigations is the Inspector General Act of 1978, as 
amended, 5 U.S.C. app. 3.
    (3) The Agency's system of records, EPA-46 system of records is 
maintained by the National Enforcement Investigations Center, Office of 
Criminal Enforcement, Forensics, and Training, a component of EPA which 
performs as its principal function activities pertaining to the 
enforcement of criminal laws. Authority for the criminal law enforcement 
activities comes from Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1970 (5 U.S.C. app. 
1), effective December 2, 1970; Powers of Environmental Protection 
Agency, 18 U.S.C. 3063; Comprehensive Environmental Response 
Compensation and Liability Act , 42 U.S.C. 9603; Resource Conservation 
and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. 6928; Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 
33 U.S.C. 1319, 1321; Toxic Substances Control Act, 15 U.S.C. 2614, 
2615; Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7413; Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and 
Rodenticide Act, 7 U.S.C. 136j, 136l; Safe Drinking Water Act, 42 U.S.C. 
300h-2, 300i-1; Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act of 
1986, 42 U.S.C. 11045; and the Marine Protection, Research, and 
Sanctuaries Act of 1972, 33 U.S.C. 1415.
    (d) Scope of Exemption. EPA systems of records 17, 40, and 46 are 
exempted from the following provisions of the PA: 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3) 
and (4); (d); (e)(1), (2), (3), (4)(G), and (H), (5), and (8); (f)(2) 
through (5); and (g). To the extent that the exemption for EPA systems 
of records 17, 40, and 46 claimed under 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) of the Act 
is held to be invalid, then an exemption under 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2) is 
claimed for these systems of records from (c)(3), (d), (e)(1), 
(e)(4)(G), (H), and (f)(2) through (5). For Agency's system of records, 
EPA system 40, an exemption is separately claimed under 5 U.S.C. 
552(k)(5) from (c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (4)(H), and (f)(2) 
through (5).
    (e) Reasons for exemption. EPA systems of records 17, 40, and 46 are 
exempted from the above provisions of the PA for the following reasons:
    (1) 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3) requires an agency to make the accounting of 
each disclosure of records available to the individual named in the 
record upon request. These accountings must state the date, nature, and 
purpose of each disclosure of a record and the name and address of the 
recipient. Accounting for each disclosure would alert the subjects of an 
investigation to the existence of the investigation and the fact that 
they are subjects of the investigation. The release of such information 
to the subjects of an investigation would provide them with significant 
information concerning the nature of the investigation, and could 
seriously impede or compromise the investigation, endanger the physical 
safety of confidential sources, witnesses, law enforcement personnel and 
their families,

[[Page 221]]

and lead to the improper influencing of witnesses, the destruction of 
evidence, or the fabrication of testimony.
    (2) 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(4) requires an agency to inform any person or 
other agency about any correction or notation of dispute made by the 
agency in accordance with subsection (d) of the Act. Since EPA is 
claiming that these systems of records are exempt from subsection (d) of 
the Act, concerning access to records, this section is inapplicable and 
is exempted to the extent that these systems of records are exempted 
from subsection (d) of the Act.
    (3) 5 U.S.C. 552a(d) requires an agency to permit an individual to 
gain access to records pertaining to him or her, to request amendment to 
such records, to request a review of an agency decision not to amend 
such records, and to contest the information contained in such records. 
Granting access to records in these systems of records could inform the 
subject of an investigation of an actual or potential criminal violation 
of the existence of that investigation, of the nature and scope of the 
information and evidence obtained as to his activities, of the identity 
of confidential sources, witnesses, and law enforcement personnel, and 
could provide information to enable the subject to avoid detection or 
apprehension. Granting access to such information could seriously impede 
or compromise an investigation, endanger the physical safety of 
confidential sources, witnesses, law enforcement personnel and their 
families, lead to the improper influencing of witnesses, the destruction 
of evidence, or the fabrication of testimony, and disclose investigative 
techniques and procedures. In addition, granting access to such 
information could disclose classified, security-sensitive, or 
confidential business information and could constitute an unwarranted 
invasion of the personal privacy of others.
    (4) 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(1) requires each agency to maintain in its 
records only such information about an individual as is relevant and 
necessary to accomplish a purpose of the agency required by statute or 
by Executive order of the President. The application of this provision 
could impair investigations and law enforcement, because it is not 
always possible to detect the relevance or necessity of specific 
information in the early stages of an investigation. Relevance and 
necessity are often questions of judgment and timing, and it is only 
after the information is evaluated that the relevance and necessity of 
such information can be established. In addition, during the course of 
the investigation, the investigator may obtain information which is 
incidental to the main purpose of the investigation but which may relate 
to matters under the investigative jurisdiction of another agency. Such 
information cannot readily be segregated. Furthermore, during the course 
of the investigation, the investigator may obtain information concerning 
the violation of laws other than those which are within the scope of his 
jurisdiction. In the interest of effective law enforcement, the EPA 
investigators should retain this information, since it can aid in 
establishing patterns of criminal activity and can provide valuable 
leads for other law enforcement agencies.
    (5) 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(2) requires an agency to collect information to 
the greatest extent practicable directly from the subject individual 
when the information may result in adverse determinations about an 
individual's rights, benefits, and privileges under Federal programs. 
The application of this provision could impair investigations and law 
enforcement by alerting the subject of an investigation of the existence 
of the investigation, enabling the subject to avoid detection or 
apprehension, to influence witnesses improperly, to destroy evidence, or 
to fabricate testimony. Moreover, in certain circumstances, the subject 
of an investigation cannot be required to provide information to 
investigators, and information must be collected from other sources. 
Furthermore, it is often necessary to collect information from sources 
other than the subject of the investigation to verify the accuracy of 
the evidence collected.
    (6) 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(3) requires an agency to inform each person 
whom it asks to supply information, on a form that can be retained by 
the person, of the authority under which the information is sought and 
whether disclosure

[[Page 222]]

is mandatory or voluntary; of the principal purposes for which the 
information is intended to be used; of the routine uses which may be 
made of the information; and of the effects on the person, if any, of 
not providing all or any part of the requested information. The 
application of this provision could provide the subject of an 
investigation with substantial information about the nature of that 
investigation, which could interfere with the investigation. Moreover, 
providing such a notice to the subject of an investigation could 
seriously impede or compromise on undercover investigation by revealing 
its existence and could endanger the physical safety of confidential 
sources, witnesses, and investigators by revealing their identities.
    (7) 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4) (G) and (H) require an agency to publish a 
Federal Register notice concerning its procedures for notifying an 
individual at his request if the system of records contains a record 
pertaining to him or her, how to gain access to such a record, and how 
to contest its content. Since EPA is claiming that these systems of 
records are exempted from parts of subsection (f)(2) through (5) of the 
Act, concerning agency rules, and subsection (d) of the Act, concerning 
access to records, these requirements are inapplicable and are exempted 
to the extent that these systems of records are exempted from 
subsections (f) and (d) of the Act. Although EPA is claiming exemption 
from these requirements, the Agency has published such a notice 
concerning its notification, access, and contest procedures because, 
under certain circumstances, EPA might decide it is appropriate for an 
individual to have access to all or a portion of the individual's 
records in these systems of records.
    (8) 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(5) requires an agency to maintain its records 
with such accuracy, relevance, timeliness, and completeness as is 
reasonably necessary to assure fairness to the individual in making any 
determination about the individual. Since the Act defines maintain to 
include the collection of information, complying with this provision 
would prevent the collection of any data not shown to be accurate, 
relevant, timely, and complete at the moment it is collected. In 
collecting information for criminal law enforcement purposes, it is not 
possible to determine in advance what information is accurate, relevant, 
timely, and complete. Facts are first gathered and then placed into a 
logical order to prove or disprove objectively the criminal behavior of 
an individual. Material that may seem unrelated, irrelevant, or 
incomplete when collected may take on added meaning or significance as 
the investigation progresses. The restrictions of this provision could 
interfere with the preparation of a complete investigative report, 
thereby impeding effective law enforcement.
    (9) 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(8) requires an agency to make reasonable 
efforts to serve notice on an individual when any record on such 
individual is made available to any person under compulsory legal 
process when such process becomes a matter of public record. Complying 
with this provision could prematurely reveal an ongoing criminal 
investigation to the subject of the investigation.
    (10) 5 U.S.C. 552a(f)(1) requires an agency to promulgate rules 
which shall establish procedures whereby an individual can be notified 
in response to his request if any system of records named by the 
individual contains a record pertaining to him or her. Since EPA is 
claiming that these systems of records are exempt from subsection (d) of 
the Act, concerning access to records, the requirements of subsections 
(f)(2) through (5) of the Act, concerning agency rules for obtaining 
access to such records, are inapplicable and are exempted to the extent 
that these systems of records are exempted from subsection (d) of the 
Act. Although EPA is claiming exemption from the requirements of 
subsection (f)(2) through (5) of the Act, EPA has promulgated rules 
which establish Agency procedures because, under certain circumstances, 
it might be appropriate for an individual to have access to all or a 
portion of his records in these systems of records. These procedures are 
described elsewhere in this part.
    (11) 5 U.S.C. 552a(g) provides for civil remedies if an agency fails 
to comply

[[Page 223]]

with the requirements concerning access to records under subsections 
(d)(1) and (3) of the Act; maintenance of records under subsection 
(e)(5) of the Act; and any other provision of the Act, or any rule 
promulgated thereunder, in such a way as to have an adverse effect on an 
individual. Since EPA is claiming that these systems of records are 
exempt from subsections (c)(3) and (4), (d), (e)(1), (2), (3), (4)(G), 
(H), and (I), (5), and (8), and (f) of the Act, the provisions of 
subsection (g) of the Act are inapplicable and are exempted to the 
extent that these systems of records are exempted from those subsections 
of the Act.
    (f) Exempt records provided by another agency. Individuals may not 
have access to records maintained by the EPA if such records were 
provided by another Federal agency which has determined by regulation 
that such records are subject to general exemption under 5 U.S.C. 
552a(j). If an individual requests access to such exempt records, EPA 
will consult with the source agency.
    (g) Exempt records included in a nonexempt system of records. All 
records obtained from a system of records that has been determined by 
regulation to be subject to general exemption under 5 U.S.C. 552a(j) 
retain their exempt status even if such records are also included in a 
system of records for which a general exemption has not been claimed.





Previous  Home  Next